Withdrawal Agreement Meaningful Votes

21. prosince 2020 | Vít Zemčík | Nezařazené | Sdílet na Facebooku

They will vote on the withdrawal agreement on the Irish backstop, the divorce law and citizens` rights. By the end of March 2019, the government had not won any of the major votes. This resulted in a series of non-binding „indicative votes“ on possible options for Brexit and the delay in the withdrawal date. 6. The „smart vote“ is a treaty vote that is not limited to the current treaty. 3. There is a legal obligation that the House of Commons must approve the withdrawal agreement by resolution – the „wise vote“ – as a precondition for ratification. These three so-called sensible votes on May`s withdrawal deal are among the great voices in the history of the British Parliament. They agreed with the vote on the repeal of the maize laws, which ended the trade defence of agricultural products and divided the Conservative party in 1846 (Schonhardt-Bailey in 2006), as well as the Great Reform Act that changed the system of parliamentary representation in 1832, conservative MPs breaking the party line playing a central role (Aidt and Franck 2013).

, 2019). It is historically very rare for a British government to lose with more than 100 votes on an important piece of legislation. The last time was in 1924, when Ramsay MacDonald`s minority Labour government succumbed with 166, 161 and 140 losers. But it is still unclear whether he will get away with it – both the Labour Party and the Democratic Unionist Party say they will vote against the withdrawal deal on Friday. On 18 June, Lord Hailsham`s amendment was accepted by the Lords, a defeat for the government by 354 votes to 235: a majority of 119 [59] [60] For more information, the House of Commons published a background paper on the judicious vote. Unlike the House of Commons, which must approve both agreements, the Lords will only debate a proposal that „takes note“ of the government`s agreement. Although the Lords have the opportunity to debate this proposal, they do not need to vote on it until the government can move on to the next phase. Standing Order No. 24B says: „Where, according to the opinion of the spokesperson… A movement… In neutral terms, no amendments can be tabled on this subject.

[68] The Grieves amendment does not apply this permanent decision to any request made as part of the meaningful vote of the Act that would amend any request for the withdrawal process by Parliament. [2] On December 4, 2018, the government tabled a business motion to set the timetable for the meaningful vote, as requested in S13 (1) (b), with the vote scheduled for December 11, 2018. [69] This flexibility and electoral margin is important because Parliament`s role in drafting treaties will be actively considered in the future, with the House of Lords Constitutional Committee and, with respect to trade agreements, the House of Commons International Trade Committee, which is conducting both investigations into this issue.

Komentáře jsou uzavřené.